Skip to main content

Olbes vs. Deciembre, 457 SCRA 341

 A case digest of Olbes vs. Deciembre, 457 SCRA 341.

Case Title: Spouses Franklin and Lourdes Olbes vs. Atty. Victor V. Deciembre

Citation: A.C. No. 5365, April 27, 2005

Facts

  • The Olbes spouses engaged Atty. Deciembre to represent them in a civil case.
  • As security for his legal fees, the spouses gave Atty. Deciembre signed blank checks.
  • The civil case was resolved, and the Olbes spouses paid Atty. Deciembre's fees in full.
  • Despite full payment, Atty. Deciembre filled out the blank checks with amounts far exceeding the agreed-upon fees and deposited them.
  • Additionally, Atty. Deciembre initiated unfounded criminal cases (for estafa and violation of the bouncing checks law) against the Olbes spouses.

Issues

  • Whether Atty. Deciembre violated the Code of Professional Responsibility by filling out blank checks with unauthorized amounts.
  • Whether Atty. Deciembre's act of filing unfounded criminal suits against his clients constituted misconduct.

Key Points for Law Students

  • Attorney-Client Relationship: The lawyer-client relationship is built on trust. Attorneys are bound to act with utmost fidelity and good faith in dealings with their clients.
  • Unauthorized Actions: Lawyers cannot take actions without their client's express consent. This includes filling out blank checks entrusted to them with amounts exceeding what has been agreed on.
  • Misuse of Legal Processes: Attorneys must uphold the law and use the legal process for legitimate purposes. Filing baseless criminal cases to harass or intimidate clients is a serious ethical violation.
  • Code of Professional Responsibility: Attorneys are bound to follow the Code of Professional Responsibility. Violations of these ethical standards can lead to disciplinary action, including suspension or disbarment.

Court Decision

The Supreme Court found Atty. Victor V. Deciembre guilty of gross misconduct and in violation of the following Rules in the Code of Professional Responsibility:

  • Rule 1.01 - A lawyer shall not engage in unlawful, dishonest, immoral, or deceitful conduct.
  • Rule 7.03 - A lawyer shall not engage in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law.

Penalty

While the IBP Commissioner recommended a two-year suspension, the Supreme Court found this penalty to be too light. Due to the severity of the misconduct, the Court instead ruled to disbar Atty. Deciembre.

Significance

The Olbes vs. Deciembre case serves as a stark reminder of the consequences attorneys can face when they violate the fundamental tenets of the legal profession. Trust and integrity are non-negotiable, and lawyers must ensure their actions align with professional standards to protect the public and uphold the administration of justice.

Labels:
Location: Davao City, Davao del Sur, Philippines

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Resolutory Conditions in Obligations and Contracts under Philippine Law

  What are Resolutory Conditions? A resolutory condition is a type of condition attached to a contract or obligation. When this condition is fulfilled, the contract or obligation is automatically extinguished (resolved). Key point:  Resolutory conditions undo an existing contract, as if it never happened in the first place. Resolutory Conditions in Philippine Law The primary source for understanding resolutory conditions in the Philippines is the New Civil Code (Republic Act 386): Article 1191:  Obligations for which a specific date (day certain) is fixed are only demandable when that day arrives. An obligation with a resolutory period takes effect immediately but will end upon the arrival of the specified date. Article 1192:  Even if there isn't a specific date, the courts can establish a period if it can be determined from context that a timeframe was intended. The duration of a period can also be established by the courts if it is dependent on the debtor's will. I...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gaite vs. Fonacier (G.R. No. L-11827, July 31, 1961)

  Background: Fernando Gaite owned mining claims containing iron ore. Isabelo Fonacier was a businessman interested in purchasing the iron ore. The Contract: On November 8, 1954, Gaite and Fonacier entered into a contract ("Revocation of Power of Attorney and Contract") where: Gaite revoked a Power of Attorney he had previously granted to someone else regarding the mining claims. Gaite sold Fonacier an estimated 24,000 tons of iron ore from the mining claims for a lump sum price. A surety company issued a bond on December 8, 1954, to guarantee Fonacier's payment to Gaite. This bond expired on December 8, 1955. The Dispute: A disagreement arose between Gaite and Fonacier regarding the amount of iron ore actually delivered: Gaite claimed that he fulfilled the contract and delivered close to the estimated amount. Fonacier alleged that only around 7,573 tons were delivered and sought damages of over P200,000.00. The Legal Proceedings: Gaite filed a case against Fonacier to co...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is a Resolutory Period?

A resolutory period is a specific timeframe attached to an obligation or contract. The fulfillment of the obligation or termination of the contract happens upon the arrival of this period. It's important to understand that a resolutory period operates differently from a regular period or deadline. With a regular period, the obligation becomes due and must be fulfilled on a particular date. With a resolutory period, the contract comes to an end. Key Points (Based on the Civil Code of the Philippines): Article 1191  - Contracts with a resolutory period become effective at once but are terminated upon the arrival of the set period. Article 1192  - If the obligation of either party becomes impossible to fulfill (due to no fault of the parties), the obligation is extinguished. Article 1193  - In cases with a set period, the obligation only becomes demandable when that period arrives. However, there's the concept of a "day certain," a period that will undoubtedly happen, ev...
Post a Comment
Read more