Skip to main content

In re: Avanceña, 20 SCRA 1012

A case digest with key points for law students of the case In re: Avanceña, 20 SCRA 1012:

Case Title: In re: Attorney Jose Avanceña

Citation: G.R. No. 407, August 15, 1967 (20 SCRA 1012)

Facts:

  • Attorney Jose Avanceña was convicted of falsification of a public document under Article 172 of the Revised Penal Code.
  • The trial court found that Avanceña used his position as a lawyer to defraud his clients.
  • Due to this conviction, the Supreme Court provisionally suspended Avanceña from the practice of law pending the final outcome of his criminal appeal.
  • The Court of Appeals later affirmed Avanceña's conviction.

Issue:

Whether or not an attorney convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude, especially one in which he abused his position as a lawyer, should be disbarred.

Holding:

Yes. The Supreme Court disbarred Attorney Avanceña.

Reasoning:

  • Conviction as grounds for disbarment: An attorney's conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude is a ground for disbarment under Section 27, Rule 138 of the Rules of Court.
  • Moral Turpitude: Falsification of a public document is a crime demonstrating moral turpitude, as it involves dishonesty and a lack of integrity.
  • Abuse of professional position: When an attorney abuses their professional position in committing a crime, it reflects poorly on the legal profession and undermines public trust.
  • Effect of Pardon: While Avanceña received a conditional pardon, it only relieved him from the penal consequences of his crime and did not prevent disbarment.

Key Points for Law Students:

  • Moral Character: Lawyers are held to a high standard of moral character. A conviction for a crime involving moral turpitude can be grounds for disbarment, regardless of any subsequent pardon.
  • Public Trust: Lawyers have a duty to uphold the law and maintain public trust in the legal profession. Abusing one's position as a lawyer is an act that warrants severe disciplinary measures.
  • Consequences of Criminal Actions: A criminal conviction can have serious repercussions for a lawyer's ability to practice law, even if the conviction involves actions outside the direct scope of their legal work.

Labels:
Location: Davao City, Davao del Sur, Philippines

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Resolutory Conditions in Obligations and Contracts under Philippine Law

  What are Resolutory Conditions? A resolutory condition is a type of condition attached to a contract or obligation. When this condition is fulfilled, the contract or obligation is automatically extinguished (resolved). Key point:  Resolutory conditions undo an existing contract, as if it never happened in the first place. Resolutory Conditions in Philippine Law The primary source for understanding resolutory conditions in the Philippines is the New Civil Code (Republic Act 386): Article 1191:  Obligations for which a specific date (day certain) is fixed are only demandable when that day arrives. An obligation with a resolutory period takes effect immediately but will end upon the arrival of the specified date. Article 1192:  Even if there isn't a specific date, the courts can establish a period if it can be determined from context that a timeframe was intended. The duration of a period can also be established by the courts if it is dependent on the debtor's will. I...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gaite vs. Fonacier (G.R. No. L-11827, July 31, 1961)

  Background: Fernando Gaite owned mining claims containing iron ore. Isabelo Fonacier was a businessman interested in purchasing the iron ore. The Contract: On November 8, 1954, Gaite and Fonacier entered into a contract ("Revocation of Power of Attorney and Contract") where: Gaite revoked a Power of Attorney he had previously granted to someone else regarding the mining claims. Gaite sold Fonacier an estimated 24,000 tons of iron ore from the mining claims for a lump sum price. A surety company issued a bond on December 8, 1954, to guarantee Fonacier's payment to Gaite. This bond expired on December 8, 1955. The Dispute: A disagreement arose between Gaite and Fonacier regarding the amount of iron ore actually delivered: Gaite claimed that he fulfilled the contract and delivered close to the estimated amount. Fonacier alleged that only around 7,573 tons were delivered and sought damages of over P200,000.00. The Legal Proceedings: Gaite filed a case against Fonacier to co...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is a Resolutory Period?

A resolutory period is a specific timeframe attached to an obligation or contract. The fulfillment of the obligation or termination of the contract happens upon the arrival of this period. It's important to understand that a resolutory period operates differently from a regular period or deadline. With a regular period, the obligation becomes due and must be fulfilled on a particular date. With a resolutory period, the contract comes to an end. Key Points (Based on the Civil Code of the Philippines): Article 1191  - Contracts with a resolutory period become effective at once but are terminated upon the arrival of the set period. Article 1192  - If the obligation of either party becomes impossible to fulfill (due to no fault of the parties), the obligation is extinguished. Article 1193  - In cases with a set period, the obligation only becomes demandable when that period arrives. However, there's the concept of a "day certain," a period that will undoubtedly happen, ev...
Post a Comment
Read more