Skip to main content

In re: Abesamis, 102 Phil. 1182

 A case digest of In re: Abesamis, 102 Phil. 1182, including important points for legal reference:

Case Name: In re: Eduardo A. Abesamis

Citation: 102 Phil. 1182 (1958)

Background:

  • Eduardo Abesamis, a Justice of the Peace in Isabela, Philippines, was accused of directly accepting a bribe.
  • He allegedly demanded and received money from a woman to dismiss a criminal case against her relative.

Legal Issue:

  • Did the act of Abesamis constitute direct bribery under Article 210 of the Revised Penal Code?
  • Was the information (formal accusation) filed against Abesamis legally sufficient and specific enough to sustain a conviction?

Ruling of the Supreme Court:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that the information was defective. While it may have been possible to charge Abesamis under Article 210, the specific language of the information didn't clearly indicate whether he was being charged with:

    • Agreeing to perform an act in exchange for a bribe, where the act was done.
    • Agreeing to perform an act but failing to complete it.

  • The Court emphasized that criminal prosecutions require a high level of clarity and specificity in accusations.

Key Legal Points:

  • Direct Bribery (Article 210 Revised Penal Code): A public officer who accepts a bribe related to their official duties commits direct bribery.
  • Specificity of Accusations: Even in instances where wrongdoing is likely, a criminal charge must be detailed, clearly stating the specific act alleged.
  • Due Process: Individuals have the right to be fully informed about the charges against them to ensure a fair defense.

Significance of the Case:

The In re: Abesamis case highlights the importance of clarity and specificity in criminal accusations. It underscores the principle that legal processes must afford due process to individuals accused of crimes.

Disclaimer: This information serves as an educational summary. It's always advisable to consult a legal professional for specific legal advice.

Labels:
Location: Davao City, Davao del Sur, Philippines

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Resolutory Conditions in Obligations and Contracts under Philippine Law

  What are Resolutory Conditions? A resolutory condition is a type of condition attached to a contract or obligation. When this condition is fulfilled, the contract or obligation is automatically extinguished (resolved). Key point:  Resolutory conditions undo an existing contract, as if it never happened in the first place. Resolutory Conditions in Philippine Law The primary source for understanding resolutory conditions in the Philippines is the New Civil Code (Republic Act 386): Article 1191:  Obligations for which a specific date (day certain) is fixed are only demandable when that day arrives. An obligation with a resolutory period takes effect immediately but will end upon the arrival of the specified date. Article 1192:  Even if there isn't a specific date, the courts can establish a period if it can be determined from context that a timeframe was intended. The duration of a period can also be established by the courts if it is dependent on the debtor's will. I...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gaite vs. Fonacier (G.R. No. L-11827, July 31, 1961)

  Background: Fernando Gaite owned mining claims containing iron ore. Isabelo Fonacier was a businessman interested in purchasing the iron ore. The Contract: On November 8, 1954, Gaite and Fonacier entered into a contract ("Revocation of Power of Attorney and Contract") where: Gaite revoked a Power of Attorney he had previously granted to someone else regarding the mining claims. Gaite sold Fonacier an estimated 24,000 tons of iron ore from the mining claims for a lump sum price. A surety company issued a bond on December 8, 1954, to guarantee Fonacier's payment to Gaite. This bond expired on December 8, 1955. The Dispute: A disagreement arose between Gaite and Fonacier regarding the amount of iron ore actually delivered: Gaite claimed that he fulfilled the contract and delivered close to the estimated amount. Fonacier alleged that only around 7,573 tons were delivered and sought damages of over P200,000.00. The Legal Proceedings: Gaite filed a case against Fonacier to co...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is a Resolutory Period?

A resolutory period is a specific timeframe attached to an obligation or contract. The fulfillment of the obligation or termination of the contract happens upon the arrival of this period. It's important to understand that a resolutory period operates differently from a regular period or deadline. With a regular period, the obligation becomes due and must be fulfilled on a particular date. With a resolutory period, the contract comes to an end. Key Points (Based on the Civil Code of the Philippines): Article 1191  - Contracts with a resolutory period become effective at once but are terminated upon the arrival of the set period. Article 1192  - If the obligation of either party becomes impossible to fulfill (due to no fault of the parties), the obligation is extinguished. Article 1193  - In cases with a set period, the obligation only becomes demandable when that period arrives. However, there's the concept of a "day certain," a period that will undoubtedly happen, ev...
Post a Comment
Read more