Skip to main content

In re: Abesamis, 102 Phil. 1182

 A case digest of In re: Abesamis, 102 Phil. 1182, including important points for legal reference:

Case Name: In re: Eduardo A. Abesamis

Citation: 102 Phil. 1182 (1958)

Background:

  • Eduardo Abesamis, a Justice of the Peace in Isabela, Philippines, was accused of directly accepting a bribe.
  • He allegedly demanded and received money from a woman to dismiss a criminal case against her relative.

Legal Issue:

  • Did the act of Abesamis constitute direct bribery under Article 210 of the Revised Penal Code?
  • Was the information (formal accusation) filed against Abesamis legally sufficient and specific enough to sustain a conviction?

Ruling of the Supreme Court:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that the information was defective. While it may have been possible to charge Abesamis under Article 210, the specific language of the information didn't clearly indicate whether he was being charged with:

    • Agreeing to perform an act in exchange for a bribe, where the act was done.
    • Agreeing to perform an act but failing to complete it.

  • The Court emphasized that criminal prosecutions require a high level of clarity and specificity in accusations.

Key Legal Points:

  • Direct Bribery (Article 210 Revised Penal Code): A public officer who accepts a bribe related to their official duties commits direct bribery.
  • Specificity of Accusations: Even in instances where wrongdoing is likely, a criminal charge must be detailed, clearly stating the specific act alleged.
  • Due Process: Individuals have the right to be fully informed about the charges against them to ensure a fair defense.

Significance of the Case:

The In re: Abesamis case highlights the importance of clarity and specificity in criminal accusations. It underscores the principle that legal processes must afford due process to individuals accused of crimes.

Disclaimer: This information serves as an educational summary. It's always advisable to consult a legal professional for specific legal advice.

Labels:
Location: Davao City, Davao del Sur, Philippines

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gaite vs. Fonacier (G.R. No. L-11827, July 31, 1961)

  Background: Fernando Gaite owned mining claims containing iron ore. Isabelo Fonacier was a businessman interested in purchasing the iron ore. The Contract: On November 8, 1954, Gaite and Fonacier entered into a contract ("Revocation of Power of Attorney and Contract") where: Gaite revoked a Power of Attorney he had previously granted to someone else regarding the mining claims. Gaite sold Fonacier an estimated 24,000 tons of iron ore from the mining claims for a lump sum price. A surety company issued a bond on December 8, 1954, to guarantee Fonacier's payment to Gaite. This bond expired on December 8, 1955. The Dispute: A disagreement arose between Gaite and Fonacier regarding the amount of iron ore actually delivered: Gaite claimed that he fulfilled the contract and delivered close to the estimated amount. Fonacier alleged that only around 7,573 tons were delivered and sought damages of over P200,000.00. The Legal Proceedings: Gaite filed a case against Fonacier to co...
Post a Comment
Read more

Resolutory Conditions in Obligations and Contracts under Philippine Law

  What are Resolutory Conditions? A resolutory condition is a type of condition attached to a contract or obligation. When this condition is fulfilled, the contract or obligation is automatically extinguished (resolved). Key point:  Resolutory conditions undo an existing contract, as if it never happened in the first place. Resolutory Conditions in Philippine Law The primary source for understanding resolutory conditions in the Philippines is the New Civil Code (Republic Act 386): Article 1191:  Obligations for which a specific date (day certain) is fixed are only demandable when that day arrives. An obligation with a resolutory period takes effect immediately but will end upon the arrival of the specified date. Article 1192:  Even if there isn't a specific date, the courts can establish a period if it can be determined from context that a timeframe was intended. The duration of a period can also be established by the courts if it is dependent on the debtor's will. I...
Post a Comment
Read more

Concept of Payment by Cession in Obligations and Contracts

T he concept of payment by cession in obligations and contracts, with a focus on Philippine law. What is Payment by Cession? Cession  (or Assignment): In a legal context, cession means transferring a right from one person (the cedent or assignor) to another (the cessionary or assignee). Payment by Cession : This occurs when a debtor, with the consent of the creditor, transfers ownership of their property to the creditor as a form of fulfillment for an outstanding obligation (debt). Key Points (under Philippine Law) Governing Law:  The primary laws governing cession in the Philippines are found in the Civil Code of the Philippines, specifically Articles 1255 to 1263. Consent:  Consent from all parties (debtor, creditor, and potentially third-parties) is generally required for a valid cession. Debtor's Release:  After the cession, the debtor's responsibility is limited to the net proceeds of the assigned property. They are released from further liability unless express...
Post a Comment
Read more